Testing Pillar — Rev. 01

Testing &
Quality Control

Five inspection methods, each catching a different category of defect. Knowing which ones your service actually requires — not defaulting to "test everything" — is what keeps inspection cost proportionate to risk.

DEFECT UT PROBE SWEEP PLAN VIEW — ULTRASONIC SCAN PATH
FIG. 1 — HOW INTERNAL DEFECTS ARE LOCATED WITHOUT CUTTING THE PLATE
DRAWINGNPRO-TS-000-QC
SCALENOT TO SCALE
METHODS5 TEST TYPES
STATUSREFERENCE / EDUCATIONAL
Why Test Selection Matters

More testing isn't automatically better testing

Every inspection method has a cost and a specific defect category it's good at finding. Specifying the right combination for your service is a design decision, not a box to tick.

It's common for a first-time buyer to ask for "full testing" on every order, assuming more inspection always means more safety. In practice, each method targets a specific class of defect, and stacking every test on a low-risk, mild-service tube sheet adds cost and lead time without meaningfully changing the risk profile. The right approach is to match the test package to the consequence of failure — which is exactly what codes like TEMA Class R and API 660 already do.

Two categories matter: dimensional and hydrostatic testing (essentially every order) and NDT — PMI, UT, RT — specified by service severity and documentation requirements. See also standards stack and production sequence.

RT / UT PMI · NDT HYDRO · DIMENSIONAL BASE = EVERY ORDER · APEX = SEVERE SERVICE
FIG. — MATCH TEST PACKAGE TO CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE
Fig. 2 — Method Reference

What each test actually catches

MethodWhat It ChecksCatchesWhen Specified
Hydrostatic TestPressure boundary integrity under test pressureLeaks, gross joint failuresEssentially every pressure-retaining order
PMI (Positive Material Identification)Actual alloy chemistry vs. specified gradeMaterial mix-ups, wrong-grade substitutionCritical/corrosive service, multi-alloy projects
Ultrasonic Testing (UT)Internal, sub-surface flaws in the plateLaminations, internal voidsThick plate, high-pressure or Class R service
Radiography (RT)Weld and cladding bond integrityPorosity, incomplete fusion in welds/claddingClad tube sheets, welded joints per code
Dimensional InspectionHole position, pitch, thickness, flatness vs. drawingOut-of-tolerance geometryEvery order, standard practice
FAQ — Schema Marked

Questions about specifying tests

Requirements vary by code and industry — API-governed petroleum service commonly mandates PMI on alloy components to prevent wrong-material installation, while general industrial service may leave it as an optional buyer specification. Confirm the requirement against your governing standard and end client's purchase specification.

Hydrostatic test pressure is code-defined, commonly around 1.3 times the design pressure for ASME Section VIII Division 1 vessels, held for a specified duration. The exact factor and duration depend on the governing code and any project-specific requirements.

Radiography specifically checks weld and bond quality, so a solid (non-clad) tube sheet with no structural welds typically has limited use for it. It becomes relevant for clad plates, weld-overlay joints, or where the tube-to-sheet joint itself is welded rather than purely expanded.

Continue Reading

Go deeper into a specific area

Not Sure Which Tests Your Order Needs?

Share your governing code and service severity — NPRO India will confirm the right inspection package before quoting, without over-specifying cost you don't need.

Request Technical Consultation →